
By Jim Magdefrau
VINTON – The first consideration was given to the proposed amended vicious animal ordinance by the Benton County Board of Supervisors, at their meeting Tuesday, July 15, 2025, at the Benton County Service Center in Vinton. This is Ordinance No. 80, repealing ordinance No. 37.
Assistant County Attorney Derek Marsh explained the procedure for this. The second consideration is set for the next week, July 22. The third consideration follows the week after that. He also explained how ordinance can be read online.
In discussion, Supervisor Chairman Tracy Seeman looked at what is considered as dangerous. He said there are people in the county who raise foxes, and those who raise mink. He questioned how this works for who raise these animals and if a permit is needed from Benton County.
Discussion on the proposed ordinance led to issues of variance, at-large animals, quarantines, vaccinations and contracting of an animal control officer.
Changes and clarifications are being made from input given at the hearings.
One resident stressed the importance of responsible pet ownership. Another stressed not telling people what to do on their private property.
Other business
A land use hearing was set for Tuesday, Aug. 12, 9:15 a.m., for William Hines, for land in Section 25, Taylor Township.
Eide Bailly’s FY 25 Audit Engagement was approved.
Quarterly reports were approved for Veterans Affairs, General Assistance, Auditor and Recorder.
Dale Henry was appointed to the veterans commission.
The EMS (Emergency Medical Services) Trust Fund Policy was approved.
The board discussed a contract between Benton County and ISG Group Inc. for gas line inspection.
The board met with Matt Betterton regarding the assessment for his chiropractic clinic and how it is classified. Assistant County Attorney Derek Marsh explained the review process and the time limit involved. Assessor Larry Andressen explained how buildings are graded. They discussed the difference between the classifications of dental/medical and office/business. It was suggested this be taken up with the Iowa Department of Revenue.